They Ask, You Answer. Most MSPs Don't.

Customer acquisition is the top business issue in managed services, and it is not close. In Kaseya’s 2026 State of the MSP report, 1,061 providers fielded in November 2025, 71 percent named acquiring new customers their biggest challenge, ranked above every other issue: cybersecurity at 53 percent, revenue growth at 49, profitability at 48, staffing at 32. The leads bought against that problem are expensive. First Page Sage’s cost-per-lead benchmarks, last updated May 2025, put a managed services lead at $503 blended, $617 through paid search. That buys a lead, not a client. Assume one lead in four ever signs and the marketing cost of a single new logo clears $2,000 before anyone has scoped an environment.

The buyer finishes most of the sale alone

Set the buyer’s behavior next to that spend. Gartner’s sales survey published in March 2026 found 67 percent of B2B buyers prefer a rep-free buying experience, up from 61 percent in the prior year’s survey and 43 percent in 2021. The preference shows up in timing: 6sense’s buyer experience report from November 2025, a survey of nearly 4,000 buyers, put the point of first contact with a seller at 61 percent of the way through the buying journey. The structure of this market sharpens both numbers. This site argued earlier this month that almost every MSP deal now has an incumbent in it, and a buyer weighing a switch does the homework more thoroughly, because being wrong costs a second migration.

The newest wrinkle sits on top. G2’s Answer Economy report from April 2026 found 51 percent of B2B software buyers now start research with an AI chatbot more often than with Google, up from 29 percent a year earlier. Software buyers are not MSP buyers, but the direction carries, and the machines have nothing to say about a company that never wrote anything down.

Put the pieces together and the shape is plain. The prospect who finally calls has already done most of the evaluation, alone, wherever their questions found answers. You do not control where the buyer looks. You control whether your answers are there to find.

A pool company wrote the manual

The framework that fits this buyer is seventeen years old and came from outside the industry. In early 2009, Marcus Sheridan’s company, River Pools and Spas, a twenty-employee fiberglass pool installer in Virginia and Maryland, was failing. The New York Times told the story in February 2013: orders had fallen from six a month to barely two, and the company overdrew its bank account three weeks running. Sheridan cut an ad budget of about $250,000 a year to a tenth of it and started publishing direct answers to every question a pool buyer had ever asked him, beginning with the one his industry refused to answer in public: what a fiberglass pool costs.

He told the Times he could track at least $1.7 million in sales to that single article. Retellings since have quoted bigger numbers; the figure the Times printed is $1.7 million, and it is plenty. He also gave the paper his appointment math: prospects who read 30 or more pages of the site before a sales visit bought 80 percent of the time, against an industry appointment average he put at 10 percent. His numbers, self-reported. The same story records the company recovering past its pre-2007 revenue peak. The method became They Ask, You Answer, published by Wiley in 2017 and revised in 2019.

The framework has two working parts.

The first is what Sheridan calls the Big 5, the questions every considered purchase generates: what it costs, what problems come with it, how it compares to the alternatives, what its reviews say, and which providers are best. Buyers ask all five whether or not you answer. The instruction is to answer them in public, with real numbers, including the comparisons that name your competitors.

The second is assignment selling. The book defines it as intentionally using educational content to resolve a prospect’s major concerns before the sales appointment. In practice: the pricing guide goes out ahead of the first meeting, with a direct ask to read it. The prospect who reads it arrives informed and mostly decided. The prospect who will not read it has told you something about the deal too. The 30-page close rate is this effect, measured.

The page MSPs will not build

Run the Big 5 against a typical MSP website and the gap is widest exactly where the framework starts: cost. How many MSP sites publish pricing? No credible audit exists; it was searched for this piece, and the number is not in public. Walk twenty competitor sites in your metro and run the count yourself. The objections behind the blank page are the same two everywhere: competitors will see our rates, and prospects will rule us out early. Your competitors already know your rates. And the prospect a price range scares off was never going to sign at your price.

The buyer’s side of the argument is on the record. In TrustRadius’s 2026 B2B Buying Disconnect report, a survey of 1,862 technology buyers published in July, transparent pricing has been buyers’ number one request of vendors four years running. AI search raises the stakes on the same request. A chatbot answering what managed IT costs for a sixty-person firm can only assemble what someone published. The MSP whose site says what co-managed runs per user, and names what moves the number, can be quoted by the machine. The MSP whose pricing page is a contact form is absent from the answer.

Run it as a sales program

Write the cost page first. Ranges with drivers, never a bare rate card: seat count, server estate, compliance load, co-managed against full stack. Say where your floor is and what you decline to do at the floor. The page does not need to quote your next proposal; it needs to teach the buyer how your pricing works and prove nobody is hiding the ball.

Answer the other four in the same register. What breaks in co-managed arrangements and when they fail. When a company should hire internal IT instead of hiring you. Your firm against the national providers, compared plainly. Where your reviews live and what the worst one says. Sheridan’s instruction on comparisons is the uncomfortable one: write about your competitors honestly, because the buyer is comparing you anyway, in a tab you cannot see.

Wire assignment selling into the sales process. The pricing guide goes out before every first appointment, with a direct ask to read it and a sentence about why. The prospect who reads it arrives qualified on budget and half-decided. The prospect who will not read it has signaled something worth knowing before you spend the drive. On a sales cycle operators typically put at 90 to 180 days, content that settles cost and scope before the first meeting is cycle time removed, not marketing overhead. The same motion works inside the base: assigning next year’s budget guide ahead of a quarterly business review is assignment selling on an account you already hold.

Write for the machine as well as the reader. Plain statements a model can lift: what you charge and where you stop. If AI-first research keeps climbing at the rate G2 measured, the pricing page is no longer only for humans, and prose that hedges everything quotes as nothing.

Instrument it. Four numbers, all from systems already running: leads sourced by content page, guide-read rate ahead of first appointments, close rate for prospects who read against those who did not, and revenue attributed to content-sourced deals. The third number is Sheridan’s 30-page metric rebuilt on your own book. No industry benchmark exists for any of the four, which is a gift. Your trailing numbers become the standard, and most competitors have never looked at theirs.

The objection writes itself: 2009 was a different internet, and a pool is not a managed services contract. But the buyer data reads like it was staged for the framework’s benefit. Two-thirds of buyers prefer to avoid the rep. First contact arrives 61 percent of the way through the journey. Half of software buyers now ask a machine before they ask a person, and the machine can only repeat what someone wrote down. Pricing has topped the buyer wish list four years straight. The questions have not changed since the pool business. The open variable is whose answers come back.