Where Did the Big Deal Go?

Ask a thousand MSPs what their typical customer spends in a year, and you can watch the industry’s floor drop in a single chart. A year ago, 75 percent said their typical client spent $25,000 or more. This year, 41 percent. In twelve months, the big client went from the industry’s default to a minority experience.

The top of the chart is worse. Contracts between $100,000 and $250,000 fell from 18 percent of the industry to 6. The quarter-million-to-half-million band fell from 10 to 2. Above half a million: zero. Not smaller. Gone.

Clients did not stop buying. They started buying smaller. The share of MSPs whose typical client spends under $25,000 more than doubled, from 24 to 55 percent, and a quarter of providers say clients are cutting IT budgets outright. The same industry that used to run on a few large commitments now runs on many small ones.

The instinct that fails

The natural response to shrinking deals is to hunt bigger ones. The industry is already trying: adding new clients tops the MSP priority list at 88 percent, ahead of everything else providers say they want this year. So the whale hunt now has more hunters and fewer whales. Chasing a bigger logo in this market is a plan to lose slower.

And the ambition has not adjusted to the tape. In N-able’s survey, 59 percent of MSPs still expect to grow 20 percent or better. On a board where the big deal is disappearing, that kind of growth has exactly one durable source: the accounts you already hold.

If the logo will not get bigger, the account has to.

Grow the account, not the logo

Revenue per account is the number this playbook runs on: what a client pays you per year, and whether that figure climbs. Four moves make it climb.

Draw the attach map. Kaseya’s data shows where expansion money is actually moving: 71 percent of MSPs grew their security revenue last year, and about half grew backup and cloud management. Meanwhile most books still lean on the commodity core; endpoint management is a top revenue source for 64 percent of providers, the crowded category everyone already owns. The map itself is one line per account: the next service this client should logically buy, and the date someone will propose it. An account with no named next service is not a growth account. It is a renewal risk with good manners.

Package the demand clients have already stated. Almost half of MSPs say AI and automation is the top client need for 2026, ahead of security, yet only 13 percent book it as a meaningful revenue source today. That gap is not a reason to lead with AI. It is a reason to write the offer down, put a price on it, and define what the client gets, before someone else answers the question they are already asking.

Build tiers so accounts climb without a fight. Good, better, best, with the differences written down. An account moves up at renewal, when the conversation is natural, and never mid-term, when it reads as a surprise invoice. The tier ladder is how revenue per account grows without inventing a new negotiation from scratch.

Measure it beside the logo count. Revenue per account, by cohort, every quarter. No public benchmark exists for this number in the MSP industry, so your own trend is the benchmark. The cohort cut is what makes it honest: if accounts opened this year are both smaller and flat, you do not have a market problem, you have a packaging problem wearing a market costume.

Two distortions will try to flatter this number. A price increase lifts every account at once and looks like expansion for exactly one year, so tag it separately. And an account that climbs two tiers and then leaves next cycle was not expansion, it was a goodbye tour, which is why the cohort table gets read beside retention. The staircase only counts clients who stay on it.

Run it as a selling motion, not a service one

The attach map needs an owner and a meeting. Every account gets an expansion review on the calendar, and it is a selling conversation, separate from the support check-ins where the relationship usually lives. The person who owns the account brings two things: the next service on the map and the date it gets proposed. The meeting exists so that date survives contact with a busy quarter.

Pay for the climb, too. If account owners are bonused on renewal survival, the attach map stays a spreadsheet. A bonus tied to account growth by cohort makes the expansion review the one meeting nobody reschedules.

This is also the honest answer to the smaller entry point. A book filling up with sub-$25K clients is not a death sentence; it is a wider staircase. Every small account that lands is a future attach, a future tier move, a future expansion. But only if somebody owns the climb.

What the investor sees

Two MSP books can show identical revenue and be different businesses. One holds its number by replacing shrinking accounts with new logos, which means it re-buys its book every cycle in the toughest acquisition market this industry has measured. The other grows the accounts it already holds. Industry revenue still grew 9.6 percent last year even as deals compressed, which means the growth is happening in smaller increments, inside somebody’s base.

The diligence ask is a cohort table: revenue per account, by the year the account landed, across the last eight quarters. A book that expands its accounts survives a slow logo market. A book that cannot is one bad quarter away from flat.

The big deal did not die. It broke into pieces and moved inside existing accounts. The operators who build the staircase get it back, one floor at a time.